Carbon fiber filaments are always in high demand because of their wide uses. These days most popular and demanded carbon fiber filaments are NylonX and CarbonX. Among these two, finding which one is better is the concern of this article. First of all, we have to know what it means by the NylonX or CarbonX, and then their merits and demerits. After that, it could be easier to compare which one should keep forward in the race.
NylonX and Its Positive and Negative Side
A common question may arise in many people’s minds that what is NylonX. Actually, NylonX is nothing but an updated version of the nylon fiber. MatterHackers made this material for 3D printing. It has been using for their 3D printer filaments of PRO series. It creates when micro-carbon is reinforced with its original material – nylon. This bonding makes the produced thread sturdy for building stronger 3D painting models.
This time we need to have a clear idea about the advantages and disadvantages of NylonX. First, let’s drive to the advantages of NylonX.
NylonX is manufactured to meet industrial demand. Thus it needs to be robust enough to fulfill a certain level of requirement. Including 20% of chipped carbon fibers provide sufficient strength to the 3D printed model.
The manufacturer of NylonX experiments its stress taking capabilities by force gauge and pulley methods. They found the filament highly durable just after polycarbonate! At a peak, it can withstand up to 408 lbs. while 281 lbs at the lowest. On average, this number is 364 lbs. which is a highly satisfactory figure.
With the NylonX filament, you can go for production as soon as the 3d printed structure is completed. This is possible because it doesn’t require polishing, sanding, or scraping which are known as post-processing steps. Thus it saves time. As a result, you can meet more projects with a short duration of time and enable you to deal with more clients.
Every product has some negative side along with the positive side. NylonX has no exception. Before going to the CarbonX, knowing the disadvantages of NylonX is urgent.
The NylonX is highly hygroscopic. This material soaks moisture from the surrounding environment. This character leads to printing issues and therefore, effects output. Thus it requires making the filament completely dry before using each time.
No doubt NylonX works great in terms of rigidity and stability comparing to its original nylon fiber, it still, however, lead to warping and stringing to its resultant product. This filament doesn’t operate well with some nozzles. As a result, the filament goes ooze out and drive to the problematic area.
Another bad side of NylonX is its highly abrasive nature. NylonX should never be used through brass nozzles. Its highly abrasive carbon fiber works against the soft metal nozzles.
CarbonX and Its Positive and Negative Side
CarbonX is known as the latest edition of the 3D printer filaments. Like the NylonX, CarbonX is also made by instilling its original material with carbon fiber. This reinforcement makes the material sturdy, dimensionally stable, capable to withstand high heat and also enrich surface quality. Usually, this filament is manufactured by 3DXtech.
They dedicatedly experiment on 3D printing materials and develop many versions of CarbonX like PLA, ABS, PPA, PETG, and many more. Two dimensions of 1.75mm and 2.85mm with an amount of 1.65 lbs and 4.44 lbs are available on market. You can pick as per your project requirement.
Similar to NylonX, CarbonX has some positive and some negative sides too. First, we are going to discuss the advantages of CarbonX.
We know that NylonX has a problem with warping and cracking. However, CarbonX is free from warping and cracking which is a great advantage of this filament. It’s not only an advantage over NylonX, but most of the 3D printing filaments also don’t have this immunity against warping and cracking.
CarbonX doesn’t rely on a heated bed while performing. Thus if you own a printer with no heated bed, you can carry your design using CarbonX.
Another positive aspect of CarbonX filament is its temperature resistance capabilities. This capability comes with its carbon fiber content that provides high modulus and HDT (Heat Deflection or Distortion Temperature). Overall the system thermal performance has been enhanced.
CarbonX is comparatively affordable among similar filaments. This positive side allows starting 3D printing without paying extra.
Now, come to its negative sides. Post-processing, weak parts, and abrasive are some major disadvantages of CarbonX. Let’s discuss one by one.
For a perfect design or 3D model, you may look for post-processing tasks. Exhibit stringing and/or similar inconsistencies of certain delicate parts may requisite sanding or tuning in the slicing stage.
Carbon comes with extruded filaments that obstruct sticking one layer to another. It happens because of the sturdy elements of carbon itself. As a result, the produced objects seem weaker. You can overcome this weak part by slowing down the printing speed and increasing its temperature simultaneously.
Existing of carbon fiber makes CarbonX filaments abrasive. Thus the filament’s durability may reduce when you attempt to work with soft metal nozzles. This also reduces longibility.
Compare Between NylonX and CarbonX
We got the basic idea of NylonX and CarbonX filaments. Now, it’s time to compare these two filaments and make a verdict of which one is better.
NylonX filaments are sturdy and durable. If the project requirement is ‘strong’ and ‘long-lasting’, then NylonX could be a perfect choice. This superb filament is suitable for building home furnishing fittings, sports cars, sports accessories, build gears and similar items of product. Besides, creating a complex design of an artistic masterpiece using this filament could be a great option.
On the contrary, CarbonX is perfect for high layer heights and widths. Creating simple shapes with a requirement of strength, stiffness and safety could be easy using CarbonX.
We know that a major drawback of CarbonX is ‘post-processing’. So this feature could be the prime cause to choose NylonX over CarbonX as the user doesn’t need to think twice regarding post-processing steps. NylonX could be preferred by the perfectionists because of its no requirement of polishing, sanding, or scraping.
In a different circumstance, sanding and other tuning mechanism processes are needed to be arranged for getting the continuous result of using CarbonX filament.
- Technical Requirements:
Beyond the several discrepancies between NylonX and CarbonX filaments, one noticeable similarity is being found. A single point where these two collide is their abrasive nature. Either of them doesn’t require brass nozzles. Instead of brass nozzles, stainless steel made hardened nozzle or Olsson ruby works fine with them.
Most of the 3D printer needs a heated bed to perform. NylonX has no exception. The recommended bed temperature range for this filament is 60°C to 65°C. However, CarbonX doesn’t require any bed temperature. It can perform its job without a bed.
Both the NylonX and CarbonX filament comes with a minimum diameter of 1.75mm while the maximum diameter of NylonX and CarbonX is 3mm and 2.85mm accordingly. With these sizes, both of them produce elegant looked matte black finish product.
In terms of cost, NylonX is a bit pricy than CarbonX. It’s true, both of them are available at a price point of below 100 dollars. At the same price, you can buy 750 grams of NylonX and 500 grams of CarbonX.
The verdict of NylonX Vs CarbonX: Which One Better
It’s hard to say which one is better between these two, as both have significant positive and negative sides. Both of them are widely been used. Whatever you chose, you need to get stainless steel or Olsson Ruby nozzles for operation.
Both the NylonX and CarbonX filament has its own demand for their particulars. If you prefer a bigger diameter of the filament and want to avoid post-processing tasks, then select NylonX. On the other hand, for base material verities, thermal safety, and affordability, chooses CarbonX. Basically, it’s all about the choice of particular and the project demand.